# Cosecant Calculator

Welcome to Omni's **cosecant calculator**, where we'll study the mysterious **csc trig function**. Arguably, even if you've had a course in trigonometry, you may have missed this one since we rarely use it. Nevertheless, the csc in math is a well-defined function that can still appear in some textbooks. Therefore, we've prepared this fantastic tool and article to answer whoever asked the question, "*What is csc?*". And we'll show you **the cosecant formula** and **cosecant graph** to go with it.

So since time is money, let's **jump right into the topic**!

## What is csc? The cosecant formula

Geometry begins with the simplest object - **the triangle**. Once we get the hang of how to calculate their area or perimeter, we move on to **more complicated shapes**: rhombus, circle, prisms, etc.

But let's slow down a little and look back at the starting point. **Do we really know triangles that well?** Sure, we can write down the formula for the area (if you're feeling particularly brainy today, you can even use Heron's formula). But is there more to those objects? **Can we say something more about the sides or angles?**

The idea behind trigonometry is to somehow **relate the size of a triangle's inside angles to its sides**. To get a firmer grip on how it's done, we'll focus on **right triangles** (you know, the ones that the Pythagorean theorem is about). There, we can easily imagine that if we take one of the acute angles and try to make it larger, then the opposite triangle side will have to be longer too.

We define **trigonometric functions** as ratios of a triangle's sides. Below, please find a simple picture of a right triangle together with all the formulas (including that of **the csc trig function**).

🔎 The sin, cos, and tan trigonometric functions are all ratios. Therefore, you could use nothing but our ratio calculator to determine the missing terms!

**So what is the cosecant?** Looking back at the figure above, we see that it's the hypotenuse divided by the side (or leg) opposite the angle. Note that the above definitions do not mention how big the triangle is. In fact, that's where **a crucial strength of trigonometry lies**: even if we scale the triangle to twice its size, the values of the functions (`csc x`

among them) will not change.

However, **there is a price to pay**. From the above picture, sin, cos, or csc have a meaning for angles between `0`

and `90`

degrees (or between `0`

and `π/2`

in radians) simply because it's a right triangle. But... **do we really have to pay this price?**

As a matter of fact, **we don't**. There is a way to translate the whole reasoning to take **any real number as the angle, even a negative one**. The trick is to switch from triangles to the two-dimensional Euclidean space, i.e., the plane.

Let `A = (x,y)`

be a point on the plane, and denote by `α`

the angle going from the positive half of the horizontal axis to the line segment between `0`

and `A`

counterclockwise. (Observe how we said that `α`

*goes* from one line to the other and not that it is between them. Because of that, we often call `α`

**a directed angle**.)

Clearly, such `α`

can be larger than `90`

degrees. Even better - **it can go beyond the full angle of** `360`

**degrees**! In that case, we just consider the `360`

to be a full lap around `(0,0)`

, and from that, we begin the second one. And *even* better! Since we've defined `α`

to be directed, **we can now have negative angles**. For those, we simply reverse the direction, i.e., go clockwise instead of counterclockwise.

Now that we understand all possible angles let's **decipher the csc meaning** (and all the other functions', in fact) for them. The rule is simple enough: we recall the notation for the point `A = (x,y)`

and repeat the above formulas by substituting `a`

for `y`

, `b`

for `x`

, and `c`

for `√(x² + y²)`

, i.e., the distance between `(0,0)`

and `A`

.

So what is the cosecant in this new notation? According to the above instructions, we get **the new csc formula** to be

Great, we've learned what csc in math is, or, more precisely, csc in trigonometry. Now it's time to take this cosecant formula, and **try to understand and befriend it**. For that, we'll draw its portrait - **the cosecant graph**.

## Cosecant graph

It's quite possible that you've already seen the cosine graph or the tangent graph since they're among the most common trigonometric functions. But `csc x`

is not, so you might have missed that one. And it is a pity since **it's quite funny-looking**.

So without further ado, here's **the cosecant graph** in all its glory. (Observe that we use the same picture in our csc calculator.)

From this picture alone, we can deduce **quite a few interesting and important properties**. For simplicity and for care of your eyesight, we put them in a pretty bullet list.

- Similarly to the secant, csc in trigonometry can either be smaller or equal to
`-1`

, or larger or equal to`1`

. In other words,**it admits all real values except for the ones in the (open) interval**`(-1,1)`

**.** **The csc in math language is odd.**This means that at`x`

, it admits the opposite value to the one at`-x`

. In symbolic notation, this translates to`csc(x) = -csc(-x)`

.**The csc trig function is periodic**with a`360`

-degree period. This property means that the function's values repeat every`360`

degrees. In mathematical language, we can write this fact as`sec(x) = sec(x + 360°)`

.**The cosecant formula is not defined everywhere.**For angles of the form`x = k·180°`

for`k`

an integer, there is no`csc x`

. These are precisely the points in which the cosecant graph goes to plus/minus infinity.

We'll take the opportunity to **speak some more about the last property above**. The csc trig function is undefined at some points (for instance, `cot 0`

doesn't exist) because of the way it is defined: by a fraction.

We know all too well that **we can never divide by zero**, and the undefined points, i.e., `x`

-s of the form `x = k·180°`

for `k`

an integer, are precisely those where this would potentially happen (for instance, for `k = 0`

, we have `csc 0`

). As such, **they do not belong to the** `csc x`

domain, that is, the set where the map is defined. If we were to please a few big-headed mathematicians, we could write this whole paragraph symbolically like this:

`D(csc) = {x : x ≠ k·180°, k ∈ ℤ}`

,where `D(csc)`

denotes the domain of the csc trig function.

And with that, we proclaim the end of this section. **Two are done, two more to go!** The next one is going to be slightly more algebraic because we'll try to find an answer to "*What is csc?*" that uses functions and operations rather than words. So if you feel like you need a coffee kick beforehand, then now's the time to have it. If not, **let's get to it!**

## How to find csc: alternative csc formulas

When we begin studying trigonometry, we first learn the definitions (e.g., how the csc formula is the ratio of two sides). The next step is to leave the triangle and the two-dimensional coordinates aside, and try to **relate one function to some of the others** to obtain so-called **trigonometric identities**. Just to give you a taste of how useful those can be, let us direct you to two examples: the law of sines and the law of cosines.

In essence, we'll try to make the formula for csc from trigonometry work in our favor by **playing around with it**. For instance, recall from the first section how to find the csc function: we divide the length of a right triangle's hypotenuse by the side opposite the angle. Observe that we use the same lengths in the definition of the sine. The only difference is that there, **they are reversed**.

Therefore, we obtain our first **alternative cosecant formula**:

`csc(x) = (sin(x))⁻¹`

.Or, if you prefer fractions,

`csc(x) = 1 / sin(x)`

.However, note that this **does not mean** that `csc x`

is the inverse function of `sin x`

. That would be arcsin, which takes the sine function's value and returns the angle that corresponds to it. Here, on the other hand, the `-1`

in the exponent means only that `csc x`

is the inverse of `sin x`

(**not** the inverse function; those two are quite different things).

Next, if we take this new csc meaning and recall a simple trigonometric identity for the cotangent (i.e., that `cot(x) = cos(x) / sin(x)`

), then we can get another interesting **cosecant formula**.

With that, we now have **four different answers** to the "*What is the cosecant?*" question. Observe that each has some expression in the denominator, which, obviously, **cannot be zero**. Those are the points we mentioned in the previous section where our function is undefined (e.g., when we have `csc 0`

).

We hope that you begin to feel more comfortable around the cosecant function after all that we've learned about it today. If so, it's time to see **how to find the csc in practice**.

In other words, **we move to examples**.

## Example: using the cosecant calculator

**The clock is ticking**, and it's time to think about choosing the college (or colleges) that you want to apply to. But first, it'd be best to get a grip on **what area you want to focus on**.

To get a feel of it, you decide to **take a look at a test example in trigonometry**. After all, college mathematics can't be that hard, can it?

The first question is to **calculate the cosecant** of the following angles: `30°`

, `45°`

, `60°`

, and `75°`

. Oh, **what a coincidence!** It's as if they've made the exercise to accompany the article we're reading!

We begin by appreciating **how easy the task is when we have Omni's cosecant calculator** at hand. In there, we only have one variable field: the angle. We input the values that the question gives us one by one, and **the tool spits out the answer underneath**. Note how for `45°`

and `60°`

, we also obtain a precise value before rounding it up, i.e., with simple fractions and square roots. We'll explain why it is so in a minute.

Now, let's leave the cosecant calculator aside and see **how to find the csc values ourselves**. We'll use the right triangle definition from the first section, but feel free to try out any other cosecant formulas.

First of all, we'll draw **an example triangle** for each of the angles given. We begin with the one for `30°`

.

Note that this is an example of quite a special right triangle in which we know **the relations between the sides**. For instance, we know that if the shorter leg is of length `x`

, then the hypotenuse must be `2x`

. This is because our shape is, in fact, half of an equilateral triangle. Also, note how the triangle's other angle is `60°`

, so we can use **the same picture for that case** as well.

The csc formula in the first section states that the cosecant is **the ratio of the hypotenuse to the side opposite the angle**. In our triangle, this gives

`csc(30°) = 2x / x = 2`

and

`csc(60°) = 2x / x√3 = 2 / √3 = 2√3 / 3`

.Next, we move on to the `45°`

case.

Again, we're fortunate enough to **know the relations between the sides**. This time, it is because our triangle is half of a square, with the hypotenuse being the diagonal.

We obtain:

`csc(45°) = x√2 / x = √2`

.Lastly, we have the `75°`

angle. However, **here the story is not that simple**: we have no special triangle upon which to base our calculations.

What we could do is use **the alternative formula** from the above section with the sine. This, in turn, would require us to find `sin(75°)`

. For that, we can use the half-angle formulas and `sin(150°)`

, which is, in fact, not that difficult to calculate since `150° = 180° - 30°`

, and both `180°`

and `30°`

are **fairly simple angles**.

What we learn here is that, as it turns out, calculating trigonometric functions is, in general, no walk in the park. Most of the time, **we use external tools for it**, like Omni's cosecant calculator.

Nevertheless, we got three out of four angles fairly easily, and the last one would require some work, but is perfectly doable. Maybe trigonometry in college wouldn't be that bad? **Maybe math is the way to go?** After all, the branch surely has some good perspectives and decent salaries to go with them.