Quarter Mile Calculator
If you're thinking of entering your car into a drag race and are wondering how well it would perform, then this quartermile calculator is for you. It combines a quartermile time calculator and a quartermile speed calculator. Using only your car's power and weight, it will estimate its 1/4mile elapsed time (ET) and final speed (trap speed). With this quartermile ET calculator, you can:
 Set a target time for your drag race.
 See how a power upgrade to your engine affects your ET.
 Learn how reducing the car's weight affects its performance.
In this article, you'll also learn about the history of attempting to calculate the elapsed time and speed over a quartermile using only the vehicle's power and weight.
Huntington's quartermile ET and speed formulas
Back in the 1950s, engineer and automotive enthusiast Roger Huntington wanted to determine a mathematical relationship between a vehicle's power, weight, and performance over a 1/4mile distance (a typical track length used in drag racing). His solution was to record the elapsed time and final speeds of different vehicles, plot the data on a graph, and find a line of best fit to the data.
For the elapsed time, common sense dictates that the heavier a vehicle is, and the less horsepower it has, so the longer the ET over a quartermile distance will be. So he plotted the data on a graph of Weight/Power against the 1/4mile elapsed time and derived the following empirical equation (a quartermile ET calculator):
ET = 6.290 × (Weight/Power)^{1/3}
, where:
 ET — elapsed time over a quartermile distance;
 6.290 — An empirically derived constant;
 Weight — Total weight of the vehicle (including the driver) in pounds; and
 Power — Peak engine power at the clutch (net power) in horsepower.
When it comes to plotting the final speed, it makes more sense to plot the powertoweight ratio (more power and less weight means more speed) along the xaxis. The Huntington empirical formula for the final speed is, therefore:
Final speed = 224 × (Power/Weight)^{1/3}
, where:
 Final speed — Speed of the vehicle at the quartermile mark;
 224 — An empirically derived constant;
 Weight — Total weight of the vehicle (including the driver) in pounds; and
 Power — Peak engine power at the clutch (net power) in horsepower.
Don't worry if you only know your vehicle's weight and power in metric units. Our 1/4mile calculator (as well as the powertoweightratio calculator) will handle all the unit conversions for you!
Fox's quartermile time and speed equations
Later on, in the 1960s, a physics professor named Geoffrey Fox at the University of Santa Clara proposed a theoretical basis for Huntington's formula. He wrote up his theory in a 1973 article in The American Journal of Physics entitled,
, coming up with the following significant variables that affect the ET and trap speed: Vehicle weight;
 Engine power;
 The friction of the tire on the track;
 Aerodynamic drag;
 Mass moment of inertia;
 Frictional loss due to moving parts;
 Gear ratios and gearbox type (e.g., manual or automatic); and
 The vertical and horizontal center of gravity (compute it with the car center of mass calculator).
Fox concluded that the power and the weight of the vehicle are the major factors in determining the final speed, making it more useful than the ET if you want to estimate the horsepower of a vehicle. The other factors can significantly affect the elapsed time. However, Fox made similar measurements to Huntington and refined the constants in his equations resulting in the following formulas:
ET = 6.269 × (Weight/Power)^{1/3}
Final speed = 230 × (Power/Weight)^{1/3}
Hale's quartermile speed and ET formulas
In the 1980s, drag racer, engineer, and computer programmer Patrick Hale produced software that took all the variables listed above into account to estimate the ET and trap speed. However, he also produced similar formulas to estimate the performance values from just the power and weight:
ET = 5.825 × (Weight/Power)^{1/3}
Final speed = 234 × (Power/Weight)^{1/3}
How to use the 1/4mile calculator

First, decide which formula to use. Fox's or Hale's is likely to give more accurate results than Huntington's as they are more recent and more likely to apply to modern vehicles.

Enter the total weight of the car and driver. For a standard car, you can look up its weight in the manual or search for it online. If you have a custom vehicle, visit a weighing station to measure its mass.

Enter the car's peak power output. For an unmodified engine, you'll find it in the manual, quoted at a particular engine speed, measured in revolutions per minute (rpm). If you have modified the engine, take it to a garage to test its peak power output.
When performing the quartermile run, you need to maintain the peak power rpm over the entire distance. The start will be the hardest part, as you are accelerating from a standing start. As you drop the clutch, the engine revs could significantly decrease if you don't smoothly engage the first gear.

The results section shows you the estimated elapsed time over the 1/4mile and the final speed at the quartermile point.
Just like our horsepower calculator, this quartermile calculator can also be used (in reverse) to estimate your car's power given a measured quartermile elapsed time or final speed. To do this, put in its weight and then enter a value for either the time or the speed.
Comparison of the three equations with a worked example
Let's compare the three formulas by way of a worked example. The car we'll use is the Mercedes W10 Formula One car, with a peak horsepower of around 975 hp and a weight of 1638 lb (743 kg). Taking into account the driver's weight (let's use Lewis Hamilton, who weighs 150 lb), that makes a total weight of 1788 lb. Plugging these numbers into Huntington's equations gives:
ET = 6.290 × (Weight/Power)^{1/3} = 6.290 × (1788/975)^{1/3} = 7.699 seconds
Final speed = 224 × (Power/Weight)^{1/3} = 224 × (975/1788)^{1/3} = 183 mph
Now for Fox's equations:
ET = 6.269 × (Weight/Power)^{1/3} = 6.269 × (1788/975)^{1/3} = 7.673 seconds
Final speed = 230 × (Power/Weight)^{1/3} = 230 × (975/1788)^{1/3} = 187.9 mph
And finally, Hales equations:
ET = 5.825 × (Weight/Power)^{1/3} = 5.825 × (1788/975)^{1/3} = 7.13 seconds
Final speed = 234 × (Power/Weight)^{1/3} = 234 × (975/1788)^{1/3} = 191.17 mph
We can see that Huntington and Fox give very similar ETs, but Hale gives a significantly shorter elapsed time. The trap speed results are more spread out, ranging from 183 mph for Huntington to 191 mph for Hales. The results are similar for all three equations, and they give a good firstorder approximation of the quartermile performance figures without considering some of the other variables that are difficult to determine.